Sunday, September 29, 2013

Why Men Are Capable of Commitment

I've pointed out some things about the male attitude towards relationships that - considered by themselves - might make women despair of the possibility of a real or lasting relationship (two posts that come to mind are Men and Sexual Variety and  Men Don't Have Commitment Problems). But they only represent part of the story... 

I remember a conversation that I had with an ex-girlfriend a few years ago about our fears in relationships. I told her that mine was to wake up one day, ten or twenty years into a marriage, and no longer want to be with my wife. Of course I'd only thought about the situation from the perspective of sexual attraction, and so had unsurprisingly developed the fear that I would grow bored or tired of her after she lost her beauty.

"Yeah, I see what you mean..." she agreed - but she continued, "I guess I've always just figured that the more time you spend with someone, the more you'll have invested in them. You'll have more shared experiences, more history - more memories. You'll know each other's habits, likes, dislikes, routines and quirks so much better than any new person's, that the temptation to leave won't really be that strong. You'd have to throw away everything and start again."

She was right. And I realized right then that my perspective on that hypothetical situation - and on relationships in general - was missing a huge piece of the puzzle. I was ignoring completely the phenomenon of attachment she described. I'd considered only lust and romantic love, the two early phases of relationships, and I'd lacked the experience or foresight to recognize that the situation I feared wasn't realistic.

More importantly, I realized that choosing someone to marry wasn't so much a matter of taking a gamble on the best girl possible as it was a choice of a girl to start to build a life with. In other words, the strength of the resulting relationship wasn't merely a function of the quality of the girl I would choose; much more important would be the life we'd live together - even if it wasn't perfect. By simply choosing to bind our lives together, we would be choosing to invest ourselves in each other; and before long, that investment would outweigh the greater sexual attraction of some hotter girl, or the excitement of sexual novelty.

Now, this isn't a particularly male phenomenon, but it is important for women to know that it isn't a particularly female phenomenon either. It happens to men too. So in the same way that I don't need to fear waking up twenty years from now and finding myself looking for a new wife, neither do you need to worry about your man doing it - assuming, of course, that you are both people of good-will, who are willing to work to maintain a good relationship. Even if he isn't aware of the phenomenon, it will affect him - just as it would have affected me even if I'd never had that conversation with my ex girlfriend.

The mistake I made in thinking about my future relationship is one that plagues young Americans' attitudes towards marriage. It is the reason that couples feel the need to live together before getting married, and stress out so much about choosing a partner. If these fears were rooted in reality, no relationship would succeed. There is always a hotter, richer or more-compatible partner out there; finding them isn't a prerequisite for a happy marriage, and you aren't going to renounce your vows just because you encounter them after marrying someone else. Your partner will always have the advantage of the time you've spent together and the relationship you've built.

It is also worth pointing out that this phenomenon is the main reason why you shouldn't linger in relationships that are stagnant or half-hearted. In doing so, you are investing yourself emotionally, and - despite the shortcomings of the relationship - that investment will make a break-up much more difficult.

In any case, I am writing this post because I was reminded of the whole concept a few hours ago, while listening to the lyrics of a new Dierks Bentley song, I Hold On, which is written to his wife. It's a great song, and one that I think is particularly poignant coming from a man:

If you can't watch the video, here are the words:
It's just an old beat up truck, some say that I should trade up
Now that I got some jangle in my pocket
But what they don’t understand is it's the miles that make a man
I wouldn’t trade that thing in for a rocket
What they don’t know is my dad and me, we drove her out to Tennessee
And she’s still here now he’s gone 
So I hold on... 
It's just an old beat up box, its rusty strings across the top
It probably don’t look like much to you
But these dents and scratches in the wood, yeah that’s what makes it sound so good
To me it's better than brand new
You see this here flat top guitar, has had my back in a million bars
Singing every country song 
So I hold on... 
To the things, I believe in
My faith, your love, our freedom
To the things I can count on
To keep me going strong
Yeah I hold on... I hold on... 
Like the stripes to the flag, like a boy to his dad
I cant change who I am, right or wrong
So I hold on... 
Yeah baby lookin' at you right now, there ain't never been no doubt
Without you I'd be nothing
So if you ever worry about... me walkin' out
Yeah let me tell you something...
I hold on...

Related Posts
1. The Downside of Cohabitation Before Marriage
2. We Have a Shared Responsibility
3. Why Rejection Is a Good Thing
4. The Male Sex Drive Always Recharges


  1. Beauty and youth in a woman indicate her fertilities. Marrying someone old and ugly may lead to having defected kids or even abortions. But after kids are gotten, fertitilites no longer matter as much. By then lookings would indicate health rather than fertilities.

    I think beauty is the most important when a woman is still in her 20's or 30's at the latest for the sake of having healthy babies. After that, a woman does not need to be as pretty for such reasons. By then, how the woman can keep the family and life together is more important than her beauty. And the upbringing of a kids require lifelong works, and beauty no longer matters after the kids pass the phase of say 1 year old.

    On a cold and analytical perspective, that is how I see it.

    1. How is that related to this post?

    2. Beauty doesn't define fertility, do you know how complex fertility issues are? It's pseudo evolutionary "theory", that tries to rationalize shallowness.

    3. Andrew-nice post, but you're missing an important element: love. Attachment and knowing someone's likes and dislikes doesn't mean love. Nor is attachment a reason to stay in a relationship. When someone loves you, they love you. True love lasts, and when someone loves you they don't walk away from you, for example, for stupid shit. When things like that happen, it's an indicator and result of other inherent problems with the relationship, a failing relationship that people should run from rather than linger and rationalize themselves into staying in.

      Sometimes when a relationship ends the feeling of longing you have for someone you broke up with is a normal thing, especially when you're still alone. It certainly doesn't mean that you somehow lost out on a great relationship and it sure as hell is not a reason to regret the relationship being over. When you do dwell on the past, you are probably missing out on great relationships staring you in the face. The comment from your ex is not correct i spite of your very insightful spin on it.

      I also think that you haven't been in a relationship with the right woman yet, and recommend you not think about your ex as you often seem to, and build relationships with people in your life who care about you and not hold on to past failures.

  2. Andrew, have you fallen in love?

    ... Your last two posts seem different from all your other ones. This one in particular shows insight into relationships that I wasn't sensing from your posts in the past.

    Those seemed to be about how to attract someone (enough to start something). I'd love to read more posts like today's, e.g. how men think about what happens next, after you start something.

    1. No, but I have been in a different mode of thought about relationships recently.

    2. Andrew, love your blog! I'm making my way through all of the posts and you kinda blow my mind. I'm older and can't believe things haven't changed much over the years. You know, you are unusually insightful for your age and I think you might have a hard time finding a girl in her 20's. I've never known an older woman who said, I wish I was 20 again. But you seem to get all that. I too thought I sensed something different in this post.

    3. Juliet, he's maturing. The minute Andrew hits 30, he'll be prime husband material. It'll be interesting to see how he evolves. ^_^

      Jackie, he's not going to have a hard time finding any girl, let alone one in his 20s. Andrew had a strong Catholic upbringing and is well-versed in game, neuro-linguistic programming, and the nature of the sexual and marriage marketplaces. If he wasn't disagreeable and stubborn at times, I (a 21 year old) would totally lock him down for commitment, and I can almost guarantee that everyone else with half a brain would want him too.

    4. Manisha - oh I'm sure Andrew has no problem initiating relationships with girls. I meant, it would be hard for him to find a compatible girl that is in her 20's because he speaks/writes like he's already in his 30's. Disagreeable and stubborn? I'm rolling my eyes.

  3. so what about the articles you posted before?is this topic relate to them?
    you‘ve mentioned so many times before about "hanging there" for a man is bad ideal,like if a guy said he likes me,but does not likes me enough to commited to me,or dated me exclusive,in this case,if I cut him off wisely,does it also means I'll missed the chances to creating more shared experiences and memories with him forever?

    1. Obviously it relates.

      Look, the key thing Andrew is hinting at is that it's the MAN'S decision to remain faithful and to commit fully that distinguishes a happy marriage from an unhappy marriage. If a man checks out, the relationship is over; if he has made a decision to commit after riding several rodeos and being disappointed with the the low-MMV quality but high-SMV women on the marketplace, he's more likely to remain faithful because of the hassle of entering the marketplace again. Andrew is just starting to take notice of the importance of character, virtue, and conscientiousness, so I'm sure we'll see more posts on this topic as he continues to age and to reflect critically on the experiences with the hoards of non-marriage-worthy women he's been with. Men aren't ready for marriage until this insightful light bulb goes off and they start evaluating less for bimbo traits as they do character and good mothering skills. Mark my words: Andrew will get married in 2-3 years with a gorgeous, non-bible thumping, Christian chick and it'll be interesting to see how his other theories on SMV evolve.

      If your question isn't related to the topic his blog post is on, please don't sully the comment space; instead, head to the original post, "Cut Him Off," and ask there. In your situation, yes, cutting him off will lead to the missed chance of more opportunities with him but open up the possibility of more opportunities with a man better able to meet your emotional needs.

      Good luck,

    2. Sounds like we'll have another Dalrock on our hands.

      You're onto something with "men aren't ready for marriage until this light bulb goes off" remark--I think they're aware of the fact bimbos don't make great mothers, but they just steamroll right ahead anyway. By the time they hit 30, they actually start living like it.

      This is about the same time most men realise their dad was right about everything.

  4. Great post Andrew! I have read many of your posts and I agree with most of your opinions. Some of our disagreements probably stem from the difference in our backgrounds – although I have spent a few years in the US, I belong to a different part of the world. Regarding this post, I wonder how unrealistic your fear of waking up one day and not wanting to be with your wife is. I wish I shared your optimism about such fear not being rooted in reality. Of course many marriages last a lifetime, but a significant percentage of them – even in more conservative societies like mine – don't. You'll say if the partners have realistic expectations from their marriage and work towards making it work, it will probably work. And I will agree with you to some extent, but I still have doubts whether my wife would always have an advantage over hotter, richer or more compatible women. I think it depends at least partly on a man's moral fiber, and mine may not be developed as much as yours! Anyways, great post…good food for thought…

    1. "I think it depends at least partly on a man's moral fiber..."
      - This is true. Some men are more relationship-oriented than others. Keep in mind, though, that Andrew still cold-approaches girls in an attempt to number-close even when he's in relationships--so he may not be as committed as he initially appears. One must always tread carefully when dealing with a player who appears to have made a lifestyle change.
      - The key, though, is how well is wife understands that her beta traits of being supportive, a good mother, and cooking well don't inspire true love from her husband--that she must keep up in the looks department. If she remains fit and keeps up as best as she can, I see no reason for her husband to stray.

      "Of course many marriages last a lifetime, but a significant percentage of them – even in more conservative societies like mine – don't."
      - Change your attitudes to change your outcomes. Marriages are hard work and if people aren't willing to put the work in, they will falter.
      - Realistic standards = division of labor, mutual value sharing, etc.

      "I wonder how unrealistic your fear of waking up one day and not wanting to be with your wife is."
      - His fear is completely realistic. Look at First Ladies, for example. The vast majority of them turned into balloons well a year or two after childbirth. Men would do well to marry a woman who did yoga and pilates throughout the course of her pregnancy, who has always been naturally thin, and who takes her health seriously. I'd also recommend the highly non-PC option of hiring a surrogate so the wife doesn't mess up her body.

      In any event, it takes two to tango. If the couple is committed and both have a similar ranking on both SMV and MMV, it will work.

    2. I approach girls when I'm in relationships?? Where did you get that from?


      "I've approached hundreds of women in bars and nightclubs. Maybe thousands. I've done it in all kinds of moods and at different stages of my life; I've done it during the day, at night, drunk, buzzed, sober, when I was bored, excited, tired, horny, single, dating, in relationships, etc."

    4. Ah, yes. But in those situations i was doing it to help out a friend, not for my own benefit or to get a phone number for myself.

      I don't get into relationships unless i like the girl enough not to want to hit on other girls. If i find myself attracted more to someone else, or wanting to pick up other girls, i end the relationship.

    5. Andrew-are you promiscuous?

    6. I am unclear how Andrew's promiscuity is relevant to this discussion.

      For further information, please see page 34 of the Book of Bad Arguments, headlined "Genetic Fallacy": "An argument's origins or the origins of the person making it have no effect whatsoever on the argument's validity."

  5. Hello Andrew,

    Most of your posts have been helpful to me because of their analytical precision. However while writing the last two posts you seem to have gotten in touch with your emotional side. It is touching to see this. I'm grateful for these posts!

  6. Hi Andrew,

    You mention that the phenomenon of attraction is the main reason why we shouldn't linger in a half-hearted relationship, and how we shouldn't invest ourselves emotionally or waste our most eligible years with someone who is only half-committed. Does this apply if I'm not even in my most eligible years yet? I'm 19 and have been having sex with a guy who is 30 for a whole year now. Of course, I have developed feelings, but of course, he doesn't want to be exclusive. I have read what you explained on the topic of men not having commitment problems, and I also understand that what we have is not a stepping-stone towards a relationship. Yet, we have invested enough time in each other to have all these shared experiences and history like your ex was talking about. But if its not obvious, he has tried to make this a “just friends” situation, and I should probably be cutting him off, but I know there is the feeling of attachment on both ends, along with mostly lust, and I’m not sure what else…I have read many of your posts and they definitely give me the hard truth I need to hear, but I’m still lost because I feel like my situation is somewhat different. Any thoughts? Would be much appreciated!! And thank you for all your wisdom.

    1. Being "just friends" is being friend zoned. There is no escaping anytime soon. Men will continue to sleep with a woman under the context of "friends" without ever considering her as more. The same way a woman who has put a nice guy in the friend zone will still lean on him for emotional support and to clean up the mess after she gets dumped. She will never sleep with this guy or ever see him in a romantic way. Men continue to sleep with women all the time without provide them the commitment/emotional support or ever see her her in a romantic way.


      Maybe someday you could write an article about women in the friend zone. Most of the FWB situation is just that. Men putting women in the friend zone. It think it rarely occurs to women that we can be put in the friend zone just the way we put men there. Maybe it is our pride that puts us in deep denial.

    2. Aww, PrettyInPink, you're a pump and dump. The guy is using you for sex and is trying to emotionally manipulate you into thinking that that's all you're worthy of, when you should, in fact, be saving yourself for marriage and dating guys who are ready to commit to you.

      1) Cut him off.
      2) Buy yourself a puppy to help transfer some of the feeling of attachment you crave.
      3) Resolve whatever childhood trauma is leading you to have sex with an emotionally unavailable man. Did you have a distant/abusive father? Are you socially isolated from your peers?
      4) Understand that just because you feel a sense of attachment with him doesn't mean that he feels the same way.
      5) Your situation isn't different and you aren't a special snowflake. Andrew's advice works, so listen and adapt.
      6) Remember that we all end up with the love and degree of commitment that we think we deserve. Don't settle for a nonexistent relationship where a guy is using you when you could be with someone who adores you and respects your feelings. (This is yet another plug for other girls to remain virgins--you don't want to end up in a relationship like this and have wasted your youth and beauty on a loser.)

    3. Manisha, you really come across as a self-important know-it-all. Speaking for myself, your flooding the comments section isnt cute. Are you married? Is your man a 10? Please stop trying to curry favor with the blogger (while simultaneously looking down your nose at him and his readers) and just STFU. Some of us are teachable.

    4. Eva,

      I looked at her blog. She is a 21 year old undergrad. Mostly likely at an Ivy League or top 10 University since she stated she is a Hopkins hopeful. Her blog is a collection of articles from Andrew's site, hooking up smart, thought catalog, and other blogs. No original articles.

      Being conceited is not a good trait. Lack of true empathy is not a good trait. I come onto this site because it is refreshing to read. I like the no pity path Andrew takes in his articles. Mostly about women and their appearance. He does a great job of helping women understand that they have a greater amount of control in their dating lives. I love the latest articles that have been published. Seems like Andrew has been given a gift of being exposed to so many readers emotional side. Many men don't get to experience that often. Some men don't even get to experience a woman's vulnerability even while in relationships.

    5. Well said Stephanie, totally agree with you.

    6. Lol Eva, Stephanie. Someone had to say it.

      I have to say that she's brave to put up her photographs and identity though - I respect that.

      She's 21 - life will smooth out those edges.

    7. I agree with Jackie Oh, Stephanie, you put into words how I feel about this blog. Thomas, its true that at age 21 she has a lot to learn/experience, but the vibe I got from her comment above omine just irked me. A 19-year-old asks for advice about a 30-year-old playing games. Manishas advice is to tell her to buy a puppy, and check for abuse in her past?? How condescending is that? How does it help for the girl to hear "hey, you shouldve stayed a virgin" after the fact? I suppose Manisha missed the post Andrew made about showboating your intelligence to impress others, men in particular.

    8. Thank you. I don't like when people troll. I write myself and started a blog 6 months ago. It is not easy. You maybe able to write with correct grammar. You might be able to convey a message. It takes a lot of time of consistent writing it connect with it. I don't see Andrew's past few article as him maturing, but as him coming into his own as a writer. His topic is of an interesting nature. Talking to multiple women over the past two years most likely increased his emotional intelligence. Which is not easy. Now it is coming through more clearly in his thinking and writing.

      Back to prettyinpink's dilemma. I was recently in a similar situation. I had reconnected with an ex as a friend. We talked often and I started to feel for him again. It developed into love on my part. After a few weeks of torturing myself I came clean. He told he did not feel the same. I don't regret telling him. It set me free and I was able to start to move on to other men. He did not feel good about it at all. After a week of not initiating contact he tried convince me to be his friend. I don't think he was sure about his feelings at that point. He didn't know I had feelings, he thought it didn't make sense that I would dismiss him as a friend because he did not feel the same way. We really wanted me as a friend, that I was really cool, and that is why he liked me. I told him that made no sense to me that he could like me that much as a friend and not consider me as more. We called it a draw lol. He could reject me but I refused to be friend zoned. Now I am kind to him if he contacts, but I do not engage him. I treat him as an acquaintance. Sometimes I will slightly flirt and bring back feelings of our initial attraction. However I never agree to being friends and I do not go there. Our interactions are always brief. Maybe someday he will feel that attraction again. Until then I am able to control what position in his life I am willing to take. In the meantime I am free to find a man who can provide me with what I want. On a side note, not being enough in his case, and in any man's case is not a good feeling. Knowing you are hurting because they couldn't be what you needed hurts them too. I know he does care about me because he did respect my wishes and never pushed to be friends with me again.

    9. Manisha-sorry to jump on the bandwagon, but you do come across as obnoxious, and unfortunately you also don't seem very intelligent, in spite of whether you may be or not.

      Andrew is fucking awesome and hopefully you can find some sort of constructive way to view his comments and others immediately above. Referring to personal qualities as alpha, beta, etc, I imagine you consider yourself alpha, although you haven't exhibited such traits in your comments. That's not to say you don't have them, but they are not apparent, certainly not to me. So maybe accentuate the positives?

      Also, you might want to note that many of the comments on the blog come from individuals who attend/attended schools of a higher caliber than those you tout, and most people don't brag about it in that way. They are sophisticated enough and have the self-confidence to not leverage something as arbitrary as the educational institution they attend/attended to demonstrate their intellectual superiority. Show your smarts by saying intelligent things.

      Finally, I feel the need to say this: in one of your earlier comments (I stopped reading them shortly after) mentions wanting to have sex 10+ times per day. I imagine this to be a hyperbole, but trust me, it's not possible even for an unemployed man (what you will need in order to have that much free time) to survive 10+ orgasms per day. Maybe you mean a lot, but seems a bit detached from reality. But I'm working on an uhm experiment and hopefully I'll get to test your 10+ theory....

    10. Eva, CDC studies prove that having even one premarital sex partner reduces a woman's marriage market value by over 30%. As a rising medical student, I'm sensitive to the fact that many simply didn't have stable upbringings and other childhood trauma issues that lead them into promiscuity. Simply browsing any psychiatry and psychotherapy journal will tell you that it is a woman's biological imperative to have basic self-restraint and to exercise some rationality when on the marriage and sexual markets. That said, maybe I shouldn't be so clinical and data-driven. I am, after all, only a 21 year old virgin who has dedicated much of her academic career to issues in the economics of marriage. What could science possibly teach us about choice theory and lifestyle development, right? Maybe I'm locked up in an ivory tower and need to experience things. Or maybe we just have a misunderstanding.

      Tone is hard to convey over the Internet. I never attempted to leverage my MPH to justify my comments; instead, my theories are founded in empirical research in psychiatry, psychology, behavioral economics, and game theory. I apologize if any of my comments rubbed any in the wrong way. My participation in this blog community reflects my own thoughts and is not in any way representative of members of the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.

      This blog community has been instrumental in the development of my initial research questions and I am grateful for other positive comments and insight other readers have shared. I trust that we can all continue to grow in the best of the self-improvement tradition moving forward.

      In service,

    11. You can spout out statistic all you want, they are moot. Inter personal relationships are based on emotions and bonding. Friendships, family, significant others, pets, children can't be easily reduced to data in a medical journal. People are motivated for millions of reasons, to do unpredictable things, that influence many peoples' lives.

      Tone is not the issue. Being naive and simplifying human behavior based on medical journals that somebody else wrote. What happen to pure observation and not filling your head with the he said/she said of data collectors taking advantage of grant money? If you are studying psychology or sociology you are going to have to learn to think for yourself. Those fields are filled with pompous researchers that make connections all the time and turn out wrong. You cannot pin point promiscuity to a source such as the abandonment of the nuclear family structure. We have thousands of years of history and plenty of people that whores throughout every century and in every region. Also, the human race would not have been so successful if people weren't getting freaky. Plenty of time passed with humans on the earth prior to the Hammirabi Code and religious moral structures.

    12. Manisha, thanks for your input. You mention that childhood trauma, especially having a distant/abusive father, could be what leads me to having sex with emotionally unavailable men. Well, my father was very present and I had a great childhood, but he passed away when I was 14. I'm starting to realize that I might be looking for guy to potentially replace the empty space I have in my heart. What should I do about this??

    13. PrettyinPiink, I know you didnt ask me, but everybody has issues to overcome. I lost my father at a young age too, please dont think Im telling you to just get over it, because Im sympathizing with that lost feeling. I just think theres so much to pick up on this blog to nurture your self-confidence as a woman, that you dont need to take patronizing advice from a troll who is only a few years older than you and has no experience to back her. Stephanie also wrote you a great comment!

      Manisha - what are the statistics on 21-year-old John Hopkins braggarts growing up to marry happily and successfully? Do you have any CDC studies that speak on the secret misery suffered by such young women who feel the need to sling arrogance and elitism in order to detract from their secret sense of low worth (a result of being constantly avoided by men who can sense their inherent bitchiness from miles away)?

    14. Thank you, Eva. I didn't read this whole thread until now but thanks for understanding. Also, thank you Stephanie for you interesting and helpful input.

    15. PrettyinPiink,
      1) As a short-term fix, go ahead and purchase a puppy. Numerous studies have proven that owning a pet--and especially a dog--has lowered the rate of depression, heart disease, and other ailments. See and for more information.
      2) I strongly recommend exploring the possibility of beefing up the support group of girlfriends you have. Andrew wrote a great post called "Girl Game for Girls in their Teens" that will be enormously useful to you as you navigate the waters of your early college years. It really helps to have girlfriends that can give you emotional support, intimacy, and free potential boyfriend screenings, so you don't get scammed like this again. I can't tell you how many times I've saved one of my girlfriends from entering into a relationship with a total cad when he met with our circle; I've also been saved from dating a potential cad because my friends were able to check up on his past through our social network.
      3) Explore the possibility of deepening your ties to your campus community through secular and possibly religious involvement. Once you throw yourself into activities on campus and maybe even discover a new hobby, it's a lot easier to get over any heartbreak you feel.
      4) If you get lonely at night, studies have shown that hugging a large pillow before bed can release the same amount of oxytocin as hugging your former partner.
      5) Don't jump into dating right away. Give yourself space and time to heal.
      6) Follow Andrew's advice, below. Also, delete his number.
      7) Above all, love yourself. If you focus on the positive things this experience has taught you--to never allow yourself to be in this kind of situation again--and you read Andrew's other posts on setting boundaries and learning to love yourself, you'll be fine.

      My sophomore year of college was the best year of my life, even though it was the busiest. Go out there and get involved on campus! You're bound to meet tons of cute guys when you aren't looking. :-)

      Lots of sisterly love,

    16. Are you serious? How is purchasing a puppy a short-term fix? Unless you plan on killing or giving it away once you get over the heartache (a few months) you are stuck with it for years. Not to mention the responsibility and COSTS associated with upkeep.


      You are much better off using the puppy money to invest in your looks; more flattering clothes/makeup and a gym membership if you don't already have those things. Also invest in your personality/skills take a fun cooking or improv class. Read some interesting books and develop hobbies. Do anything to get out of the house and meet new people ect. Solidify your existing relationships with friends and family.

      Most importantly if you feel you have issues surrounding your father's death in your formative years you should seek therapy or reach out to someone in real life. I don't mean to say this in a glib or dismissive way, seriously if you feel this is affecting you talk to a professional. Whatever help you need in that regard is beyond the scope of this blog and internet comments.

    17. Yeah Manisha you need to stop it is so annoying. Besides the fact that you're a virgin and definitely come across as conceited, you're like a 4 in looks and in no place to give the kind of "advice" you do.

    18. "You can spout out statistic all you want, they are moot. Inter personal relationships are based on emotions and bonding. Friendships, family, significant others, pets, children can't be easily reduced to data in a medical journal. People are motivated for millions of reasons, to do unpredictable things, that influence many peoples' lives. "

      LOL. Typical female boilerplate when data tells them something their emotion's don't want to hear. Yes Manisha maybe young and practically inexperienced but a lot of her comments ring true. Cue the catty female comments here attempting to attack her personally rather than the content of what she has said.

      Statistics represent the distillation of the outcomes of all that emotions and bonding and motivations you talk about. They paint a picture of all that, like the final score in football match of overall trends. Your attempt to refute the value of statistics and studies and what they point to is why men often fail to take women seriously in debates like these. You can stick your head in the sand all you want because they touch a raw nerve or face reality. It's clear which one you'd rather do.

    19. Blogster25

      Just because you didn't fully quote me, doesn't mean the last paragraph was not relevant.

      "Being naive and simplifying human behavior based on medical journals that somebody else wrote. What happen to pure observation and not filling your head with the he said/she said of data collectors taking advantage of grant money? If you are studying psychology or sociology you are going to have to learn to think for yourself."

      There are plenty of professionals in the psychology field that don't do proper research. The field is heavily biased because of grant money. Blindly following a study or a statistic does not give you a logical or analytical upper hand in a debate.

      There has been many refuted psychology theories over the past century. Lets not forget about Freud or his belief that cocaine was a miracle drug. You can even extend that to the fact he was a addict to disprove many of his theories. His popularity during his time can be pointed towards his nephew being Edward Bernays, who established many propaganda theories. Or as they are called now, public relations. Without his nephew nobody would have ever given Freud consideration.

    20. Stephanie - exactly. Thank you. Anyone who has worked with statistics and studies professionally knows that EVERYTHING therein is subject to subjective interpretation. And if they don't, they're either bluffing or .... well, let's just say they're part of the problem. And most, if not all, researchers, have an agenda, or at least presuppositions that bias the work. If I even get a whiff of 'theory', I run in the opposite direction.

      As for commenters on the blog who've claimed they're more logical or analytical than others, and therefore they make a better argument, well, there again, there's no yardstick for that either. Ultimately we're all already convinced by our own beliefs and just set up different ways to affirm those beliefs. And sometimes are open-minded enough to try to assimilate new info into those beliefs and re-evaluate.

    21. Dear PrettyinPiink345,

      A wee bit late to respond, yet I couldn't resist writing a note as I have been in a nearly identical situation and can completely sympathise... I was 20 a year ago, dated a man in his mid-thirties for just under half a year. I too became very confused initially as he would be hot/cold, seemed very affectionate etc but unwilling to commit exclusively. The key point is that despite my emotional false hopes, 2 months into being intimate I suddenly knew he was not going to commit amongst the sweet texts and luxurious incentives of being with an older & more experienced guy. I realised he was a player of sorts but I could do so much better. If he is making you upset and you want more from him, or don't want just a casual relationship with him - leave him and don't look back. Sounds like you wanted it to be serious, or at least for him to really want you, so importantly once you realise deeply how deserving you are of a guy who will not play with your feelings it will honestly do wonders as it did for me.

      Perhaps ask ONE (maybe 2) women in their 30's or older - someone you trust and know they have a comprehensive understanding of men of that age. It may help you see what kind of man you were/are with, reflect on who you are, and whether he is someone you ultimately want to be with.

      Additionally I wish to humbly say that despite I do not wish to dismiss other people's opinions, keep in mind you don't need to worry too much about every thing people suggest. Everyone will have a different opinion to your situation when you're uncertain. The more people you ask, the more perspectives you get and ultimately it'll confuse you more. (eg. I didn't bother reading Manisha's comments soon on as they do not reflect useful or experienced suggestions).

      One last thing. We have youth on our side and all the explorations and intrigues yet to encounter..! Don't let him take away your happiness and ability to trust wholly and sincerely. *If* you do choose to spend time with him in future I hope you ensure you are feeling genuinely happy with just that (it can be fun, but you must must make sure you WANT that). If what he wants does not align with yours, by leaving you actually winning in the long run, as they were simply incompatible for us at that time and place. Remember that you *can* always choose - to choose better for yourself :)

      I trust everything will work out for the best in the end,


  7. Wonderful post. I have learned so much from all of your posts but your most recent three have been especially helpful. I would be interested in reading one about marriage!

  8. Andrew,
    Very interesting post as always. I'm a 31 year old woman who just ended with a relationship where I wasted my most eligible years. I was with someone who was not investing into the relationship as much as i was. We were together since I was 26. I guess I stayed with him that long because I got too attached and dumb at the same time. I recently discovered your blog and I wish I had found it long time ago. Fortunately I'm not that old and I'm positive that with all the advice from your posts and enough effort on my part, I will manage to attract the right guy and scare away the ones who are not. So, Thanks so much Andrew!

  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

  10. I am curious however, if a woman can maintain her man's sexual attraction to her to the extent she did during her younger years. If a woman does not let herself go emotionally or physically (become fat, cynical etc.) and maintains her beauty and sexiness, will her husband still think she's "as beautiful as the day he met her". Or is it youth over beauty?

    1. "as beautiful as the day he met her"? - No. But it it's surprising to me how sexy older women can be, and how little their attractiveness can diminish with age if they take care of themselves.

    2. There is a well-known phenomenon of "wife goggles". Essentially, a husband tends to see his wife as when he met or married her, not as she actually is in the present.

      It's somewhat adorable to watch in action when a fellow will posit that his wife is an 8, boldly post a picture of the happy couple, and it's plain as day to anyone else she's a 6.

      I have no evidence to back this up, but I have a hypothesis that similar things happen during pregnancy. I rarely hear men complaining about attributes like stretch marks on their wives that they would find unattractive on a nullipara. The only complaint I really hear at all is weight gain, but weight gain is unrelated to youth.

    3. Interesting point. I have a friend whose wife put on a lot of weight and he actually claimed he liked it more.

      I can definitely see how "wife goggles" could happen.

    4. @ Andrew..
      Nope..he doesn't care about what other people think about his partner anymore. He is secure enough with himself to admit he is attracted to fat chicks. He probably always was, but was too influenced and concerned by society/his peers to admit it to himself. Younger people are highly influenced by society and peer pressure. As we get older and more secure with ourselves, we embrace a more "who gives a fuck what they think" attitude.

    5. Actually, in my experience, young people have a long superficial list of things they want in a partner but as you get older, you have a small number of things that are deal-breakers for you, and everything else then falls into "who cares". For me, it's drive, reliable, devoted to his children, athlete or former athlete (not for the biceps but for the mindset), positive outlook and has my back (along with the physical attraction that's partly based on these qualities). Pretty much everything else is negotiable ... including things that some women get picky about, like hair/bald, type of job, education, politics, the arts. I definitely have boyfriend goggles in my current relationship because I know how rare the combination of values that I prize is.

      Andrew, sounds like your friend is a solid guy. He's figured out his few core deal-breakers and realizes that for him weight is insignificant in the larger scheme of who his wife is to him.

  11. Andrew, I got everyone's input but your own! I would really like to hear what you have to well being depends on it!!! :) my post is up a few

    1. Tell him "look i know that this is supposed to be a casual, no strings attached thing, but you are old enough to know that those kinds of relationships don't exist; someone develops feelings. In this case it's me, and I'm realizing now that if i don't distance myself from you now, this could end up being much harder than it needs to be (it probably is already going to be harder than it could have been). If you ever decide that you think we might be able to give a real relationship a chance, of course i want to know, but otherwise i would appreciate it if you give me the space to move on by not contacting me. I hope you find great girl someday and i wish you the best."

      The point is that you can't be bitter about the situation, since you got into it knowing that commitment wasn't on the table; the most important thing to do now is to let him know how you feel, why you are cutting him off, ask that he not contact you, and then resist your urges to contact him (or reply to anything less than "i want you to be my girlfriend" from him), and start moving on as quickly as possible.

    2. Definitely going to be hard. But you have given me the motivation to actually go through with it. Thanks so much.

    3. Pretty in Piink,

      I'll add to what Andrew said. Someone above gave some good advice, in tune with what Andrew has said before. Take this time to reinvent yourself, have fun with new makeup, new hairstyle (highlights?), new look in clothing (maybe a sleek tailored look, high heels, skirts), work out regularly ... you'll be amazed at the confidence your looking your awesomest will bring you, and I promise you, with sugar on top, that very very soon, you will have a new man, probably new men, surrounding you, giving you many new choices of a high caliber. A new awesome man in your life, better than the one before, will do wonders for your ability to put a man that is not good for you behind you - pretty much instantaneously. Your new man will be better than the previous one, guaranteed, because you will be attracting men of a higher caliber who want you and to keep you will want to make you happy .... and after your recent experience you have a sharper sense of what YOU want and need, and so you will be a gatekeeper and only let the best men in.

      Forget the puppy. Go for the confidence.
      Please check back in with us in 3 months. I will bet you will have a new wonderful sweetie to tell us about. I am so rooting for you!!

    4. Juliet,

      I know this was not written to me directly, but I really appreciated your input!! Thank you so much for your response! :)


    5. Thanks Mary!
      I want to add that what I wrote is not ... uh ... theory, it's based on concrete empirical personal experience. Everything I wrote truly happened to me.

    6. Thanks a lot, Juliet. So motivating!

  12. Great post Andrew. It made me think of a passage from The Little Prince:

    "Goodbye," said the fox. "And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."

    "What is essential is invisible to the eye," the little prince repeated, so that he would be sure to remember.

    "It is the time you have wasted for your rose that makes your rose so important."

    "It is the time I have wasted for my rose--" said the little prince, so that he would be sure to remember.

    "Men have forgotten this truth," said the fox. "But you must not forget it. You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed. You are responsible for your rose . . ."

  13. To me your ex-girlfriend's comment just goes to show how much more mature women can be & that men are shallow.

    1. I would really hate to be the man married to you. Men are shallow? Look in the mirror honey for a vision the depth of a rain puddle.

    2. I don't think men are more shallow than women or vice versa. Been thinking about Thomas's response to me (see below), and about studies that show men would rather be respected than loved (and are ok with not having love as long as they are respected), I've been wondering lately if men physically experience the feeling of 'love' differently than women. As a woman, the feeling of 'love' is a particular physical experience, I don't mean sex, I mean the feeling 'love'. I'm starting to suspect that either men don't feel this same physical experience because of their wiring, or feel it to a much tinier degree because of their inherent wiring, or feel something entirely different that they still call 'love'. The 'feeling' of 'love' that women have, is maybe why they crave relationships because it's such an awesome feeling, and the fact that men don't 'feel' this, or 'feel' this differently, may explain why they don't crave relationships but rather make them as a matter of logical choice. Have really been trying to puzzle this out. The difference is especially striking because the 'feeling' you get from orgasm lasts only a little while, but the 'feeling' from love is so long-lasting it's hard to imagine not wanting to pursue the latter unless your body chemistry really doesn't 'feel' this feeling. The jury's out on whether this is accurate, but I think it could explain a lot about how men/women think differently and approach relationships differently.

  14. Nice post. Who is Manisha Kaura? Was she hired to give opinions here? Curious...She seems like a nuisance.

  15. Hah let me stroke your ego too! Great article!! I've been reading your posts for awhile, it helped me get through some mindsets on boys and hooking up since I am currently in college.

    I'm curious though, what is your take on the hookup culture and its effect on both men and women? when I was a Freshman I came into college as an gently handled virgin, but it's been a year and... Not quite the virgin anymore. Haha. I used to feel so attached to the first few guys I did anything sexual with, but a week ago I had a one night stand with a friend and (even though I do think about the encounter) I don't feel the need to talk to him or get his attention in any way, I'm indifferent. Why do you think this is? I'd love to hear your thoughts! Write onnn

    1. Hook up culture makes things more difficult for people who want genuine relationships IMO.
      i mean...if people are drawn by variety, novelty, and easily available options, with little or no consequences, i personally think it is a hard mindset to get out of once it has set in.
      Just viewing from my own experience, there needs to be a level of contentedness for a worthy relationship to work, as well as the usual challenges for it to grow.

    2. Brett, attachment becomes more and more difficult for a person as their number of sex partners grows, especially for women. Sex outside of boundaries like commitment, exclusivity, living together, marriage, etc. will especially reduce one's ability to bond and attach. It will be especially difficult to bond to a man in the future who does not equal or exceed, in your eyes, one of your prior partners.

      You're a freshman, so see Andrew's article on advice for women in their teens and in their 20s.

  16. Hi there! Been reading your posts and asked for advice a couple of times. Didn't get much feedback but I understand you're busy. Love your blog anyway, your points are very smart, spot on, and directly appeal to women. I'm French therefore apologies in advance if my English isn't all perfect. I got a very specific inquiry and don't really know where to post that. I'm 28, been on a couple of dates with a guy who is 30. The dates went well, he initiated, then repeated the invite, we gradually escalated until we slept together on date 4. Trying to stay fact-based and acknowledging the fact that he acted as a gentleman not because he was in love but because he first wanted to get into the sack, I'd still say I think he likes me. However, things suddenly got more complex just because of a misunderstanding. I'm going to be very straightforward. We were in bed, been cuddling for a while, and then he starts to play a bit more serious. The idea crossed my mind that he was actually trying to get there and he was not going to use a condom. I told him "what are you doing ?" referring to the fact that he didn't pull out a condom. I didn't reiterate the gesture. We went on cuddling and eventually got to pleasure each other, but without actual intercourse. Retrospectively, I think he took my saying as if him going there was a no-no. Which, I have to admit, would be really weird given the situation - me already naked beside him. I told the story to two of my guy friends. Their reaction spoke for itself: he must indeed have been thinking that I simply didn't want him there, and therefore didn't even dare making another move with a condom. My question is simple: I kinda like the guy, what happened is a total misunderstanding, no how do I get myself out of the situation, that is – if he calls back ? And how long should I wait for him to call or text ? I thought perhaps this situation needs a little time for his ego to recover from the strange feeling he must be going through. Any advice ? Thanks to anyone willing to take the time to answer :)

    1. Two things I really want him to avoid thinking (just because they're absolutely wrong):
      - that I'm weird
      - that I don't like sex (understood as an absolute dealbreaker)

    2. Congratulations: you (quite accidentally) boosted your value in this man's eyes significantly.

      It is obvious from your tone of writing that you are quite taken with him, and were willing to have sex, yet I do not see that you have secured any level of commitment from him--not even exclusivity. It would be wise for you to re-read the advice on this blog for women in their 30s.

    3. Thanks for your answer treaclesmuggler!
      How is that possible for one to boost her value when she's already naked besides him doing foreplay ? I don't see that happening. Boosting my value would have been stopping him before he started to take off my clothes (at least this is the way I see it).
      Also, can you be more specific as to referring to which part of the Game for women in their 30s post you think I should re-read. Because, I'm not saying that my approach was 100% right, but I really don't see the part where I didn't follow Andrew's advice (or perhaps he can tell me if he sees it). This happened on date #4. He was always in the lead, he was affectionate in public and even took me to a friends’ event where he clearly put me in the girlfriend’s position. Our dates did not always involve alcohol and he actually did propose to see me during the day. Anyway, the thing is he vanished, and I’m not bitter, I’m moving on. I actually don’t care too much about him, I just really want to understand the workings at play, for future reference. And I also wonder, is there a remote possibility that he didn’t get that I liked him – explaining myself, I acted quite distant, took a long time to answer his texts, and refused to seem him twice stating that I had made other plans. My gut feeling tells me that even when the girl does not show too much enthusiasm, a guy still goes after her for a while if he’s really into her. But it’s true that I sometimes act overly distant by fear of doing the opposite – resulting in a lack of natural behavior I guess.

    4. Google "Last Minute Resistance" (LMR). The ideal last minute resistance is to reject a man for sex when he is seconds away from penetrating you.

      It sounds as if he only valued you for sex. You should not be having sex on the 4th date. Wait until you secure commitment (like exclusivity) first.

  17. Andrew,

    Great post. I just turned 30 and I feel that relationships, and many other decisions in life have two parts, an analytical (masculine) and emotional (feminine) side. I come from an engineering background and focused heavily on the analytical side of things. The emotional factor has taken a long time to grow and recognize. This post you did reminds me of that. I recognize the importance of having BOTH the analytical and emotional side of things together and balanced.

    I'm in a happy relationship at the moment, but my analytical engine still runs rampant. I still check out other girls, run game theory in my head, practice flirting, building attraction, look out for my best interests, etc. What anchors me in the relationship are the things you mentioned. I know I could walk away, go out there and find someone else, and build something new, but having someone who knows me and understands me and at the end of the day is going to take care of me is a huge draw. Knowing that I can work out problems with my partner and we both are building each other up to be better is a huge motivating factor to marry someone and me monogamous.

    So for the ladies reading this blog for advice, what Andrew posts is mostly true and an accurate depiction of things that go on in a guy's head. When you can get your man to see the emotional side of life and your relationship, all of this game theory, sexual market value, marriage market value stuff starts to seem silly.

    -A guy

    Manisha: You're in a nice college and 21 where I'm sure they're are attractive eligible men. Please go have hot wild unattached sex with one of them and learn to be a woman. You sound like a nice lady and men want that, but in the bedroom they'd prefer a nurse (maybe even in a latex uniform) vs a doctor, psychologist, or member of the CDC. Learn to be both and you'll have any man you want.

    1. Unknown,
      I've thought a lot about your comment today as you and Andrew seem to converge on this point (lots of choices, hard to choose, but once you do, willing to build something, but still grass-is-greener, looking out for your own interests as you put it) and why this is so different from the way I think (pick well (very hard), trust (because they are a good man), and build, no grass is greener syndrome). Good men are rare, i.e. one that I can admire & respect, so finding that man is hard, but I know what I'm looking for and when I find him, I don't wonder if I'm missing out on someone else because I know how rare he is. I think this partly comes from knowing, personally, how catastrophic a bad choice is, and therefore know, exactly, what a good choice looks like.

      But your comment has really enlightened me, I think the difference between you and me, and maybe (most) men and (most) women, is the difference between Picker and One Who is Picked. Men are inherently the pickers, so they see a range of choices throughout their lives and have to constrain themselves from not picking further once they have picked. Women (at least for a successful relationship in my experience) don't pick, they are approached and (if they are wise) reject until they get approached by a man they can accept. So I don't continually see a stream of possibilities after accepting the approach of a good, rare, man. I start building with my rare man, feeling very happy to be with him.

      I really do believe men and women without realizing it think extremely differently about many things, and I am grateful when men can talk about how they think so I can get their perspective. Really helps in understanding my man and making him happy.

    2. Engineering/analytical background or not, don't overlook common sense. Andrew's "On being a 'typical girl'" post (my favorite of all he's written) better captures relationships than this one.

      When a man enters a relationship and realizes several times that he doesn't want to be in that relationship, that's a sign that the relationship is not one to be in. Getting into relationships because of loneliness (effectively settling) is a very bad practice because it can lead to unhappiness. When someone is constantly going through phases of unhappiness, and leaves the relationship, that speaks volumes. Such relationships are the stagnant kind Andrew references that should be avoided.

    3. To elaborate, I'll reference the Offspring song, "Self-Esteem"....the more you suffer doesn't show you really care. it shows you have no self-esteem:

      Wrote her off for the tenth time today
      And practiced all the things I would say
      But she came over
      I lost my nerve
      I took her back and made her dessert
      Now I know I'm being used
      That's okay man cause I like the abuse
      I know she's playing with me
      That's okay cause I got no self esteem

      We make plans to go out at night
      I wait till 2 then I turn out the light
      All this rejection's got me so low
      If she keeps it up I just might tell her so

      When she's saying that she wants only me
      Then I wonder why she sleeps with my friends
      When she's saying that I'm like a disease
      Then I wonder how much more I can spend
      Well I guess I should stick up for myself
      But I really think it's better this way
      The more you suffer
      The more it shows you really care
      Right? Yeah yeah yeah

      Now I'll relate this little bit
      That happens more than I'd like to admit
      Late at night she knocks on my door
      Drunk again and looking to score
      Now I know I should say no
      But that's kind of hard when she's ready to go
      I may be dumb
      But I'm not a dweeb
      I'm just a sucker with no self esteem

      When she's saying, oh, that she wants only me
      Then I wonder why she sleeps with my friends
      When she's saying, oh, that I'm like a disease
      Then I wonder how much more I can spend
      Well I guess I should stick up for myself
      But I really think it's better this way
      The more you suffer
      The more it shows you really care
      Right? Yeah-eh-eh

  18. men are afraid of divorce, not commitment.

  19. Really interesting article I just came across, a few eye-opening points. e.g. men who have frequent one night stands, or the like, become conditioned to find the woman they just had sex with more physically unattractive than before sex. Vs. in a relationship where 'feelings' are already established, sex brings you closer to your partner. Seems like the best way for a man to find a good mate is to stop the carousel because it's actually harming him. And an eye-opener for women to avoid such men, because these men actually may be now incapable of making a commitment because this behavior rewires them, despite what they themselves say. So what Andrew describes in this post may only be psychologically possible for a subset of men.

    1. Interesting comment - as it applies to my friends and I.

      "men who have frequent one night stands become conditioned to find the woman they just had sex with more physically unattractive than before sex"

      Interesting theory, but I reckon in practice men who have regular one night stands get used to sleeping with 'what they consider' average women and comparing them to previous women. Kind of like progressively needing harder drugs to get the same hit.

      "Seems like the best way for a man to find a good mate is to stop the carousel because it's actually harming him".

      This could be true. But for many men their goal isn't to find a good mate rather just to get sex, and then possibly a mate if it happens. A reduction in his ability to commit is only 'harming him' if he's actually looking to commit from the outset. Few men will consciously override their instinctive desire to look for sex to look for a good mate.

      "An eye-opener for women to avoid such men, because these men actually may be now incapable of making a commitment"

      Good point, but here's the catch: the men who are actually capable of enjoying the 'carousel' and who manage to indulge in frequent one night stands are by definition the men that women want. So these guys will always win - they will simply commit when they get tired playing on the carousel, even if they are damaged goods by that point. As you say women would be wise to open their eyes to the guys not sleeping around - unfortunately women aren't attracted to these guys.

      "this behavior rewires them"

      I agree that this probably happens. But surely if someone rewires themselves one way, they can rewire themselves back?...if they reeeally want to.

      Having discussed this issue with my friends, all of whom spent their 20s sleeping about, we agree that it will take something huge for us to be able to commit successfully. Some sort of life event, like having a child maybe, or having a chance with someone way out of our league.

  20. Who loves you more?

    The guy who spends (more) money on you, or the guy who spends (more) time on you? Considering there are not much differences in terms of resources.

    Are small gestures like buying breakfast for you more telling of his love, or gestures like buying a branded bag for you?

  21. and Andrew has left the building. He most have found something better to do than his blog.Good luck and best wishes.

    1. I have not, actually ;)

      The reason I haven't been commenting much is because there are far too many comments these days for me to keep up with. The same is true for e-mails, but I have been answering a few of those occasionally.

      I have been posting less for three reasons:

      1. I have a much busier schedule than I had 6 months ago

      2. The things I think about (and therefore post about) are more difficult topics that require more time to get on paper. Compare my latest few posts to the ones about heels or not having sex on a first date.

      3. I am working on a book. In fact, just last night I wrote a great post titled "Why Your Ex (Who Dumped You) Is Still Contacting You," but I plan to use it as a chapter in the book.

      Anyway, I am still here, and still working, but in the background. Now that I think about it, I should probably make a post to this effect...

    2. I just found this blog today, and one of the first things that crossed my mind was "This guy should be writing for money".
      I lost my job last year and thought I'd try putting some serious time and effort into my art. To my pleasant surprise, it can indeed pay the bills.
      Better to scrape by, if that's what it means, doing what you love and working for yourself.
      Best of luck, man

  22. Girl age 16: “You’re such a nice guy.”

    Translation: ” I don’t want to hurt your feelings, or come off as a bitch to my friends, but I’m really much more attracted to Bad Boys – outlaw bikers, the football team’s quarterback, basically any guy who appears dangerous and exciting. You’re Nice, nice and mundane”

    Girl age 22: “You’re such a nice guy.”

    Translation: “Thanks for listening on the phone to me cry, fall into verbal hysterics and drone on for hours about my Jerk BF (oh, and my little dog too). You’re really sweet, and deserve a girl (which isn’t me) who can appreciate how nice (i.e. mundane) you are.”

    Girl age 28: “You’re such a nice guy.”

    Translation: “I know you’ve always been (an) my emotional tampon, and thanks for sticking with it – any sane guy would’ve found a far better prospect by now. And while I’m beginning to see that guys like you are stable, dependable and tend to make a lot more money than the Jerks I’ve dated, I think I’m gonna hold out for a hotter guy than you while my looks still hold up”

    Woman age 32: “Why can’t I just find a nice guy?”

    Woman age 35+: “You’re such a nice guy.”

    Translation: “Oh, you’re a Nice Guy,, let me suck that for you. See? Being a Nice Guy does get you laid!,..thanks for being there for me when I needed you; my fatherless kids appreciate your generosity too. How chivalrous of you to forgive my past indiscretion and take us in, I wish there were more guys like you. I really pity the women who can’t appreciate your kind of dedication – you are so different from “other guys”".

  23. I'm a first time reader. The irony is I couldn't get this song out of my head earlier so I finally listened to it a few minutes ago, and then was struggling with a question of intelligence in a potential relationship and stumbled onto your site and eventually this post. Thank you so much for writing this blog. I have a feeling I'll be revisiting :)

  24. I would say that it really depends on age. Teens and young adults interpret the word "commitment" or "co-habitation" as "Oh damn, that means I won't be able to fuck any other hot chicks!" Once the excitement of multiple fucking wears off, older men tend to say "Oh, who told you we have commitment problems"?